Books & Bibles
Entertainment
Fashion & Jewelry
Gifts & Giving
Home Decor & Accents
Kitchen & Gourmet
Beauty & Health
Specialty Stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ancient Mysteries: Discover the latest intriguiging, Scientifically sound explinations to Age-old puzzles
| Our Price |
$ 19.32
|
|
| Retail Value |
$ 21.95 |
|
| You Save |
$ 2.63 (12%) |
|
| Item Number |
158656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item Description...
Overview
Examines some of the great mysteries of the ancient world, drawing on the latest research to reveal the secrets behind the Nazca lines, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and the curse of Tutankhamun.
Publishers Description
For centuries, philosophers, scientists, and charlatans have attempted to decipher the baffling mysteries of our past, from Stonehenge to the lost continent of Atlantis. Today, however, DNA testing, radiocarbon dating, and other cutting-edge investigative tools, together with a healthy dose of common sense, are guiding us closer to the truth. Now historian Peter James and archaeologist Nick Thorpe tackle these age-old conundrums, presenting the latest information from the scientific community–and the most startling challenges to traditional explanations of mysteries such as:
• The rise and fall of the Maya
• A lost cache of Dead Sea Scrolls
• The curse of Tutankhamun
• The devastation of Sodom and Gomorrah
• The Nazca Lines and the Vinland Map
• The existence of Robin Hood
These true mystery stories twist and turn like a good whodunit, as James and Thorpe present the evidence for and against the expert theories, shedding new light on humankind's age-old struggle to make sense of the past. Ancient Mysteries will entertain and enlighten, delight the curious and inform the serious.
“CHOCK-FULL OF FUN-FACTS, HELPFUL MAPS, AND DIAGRAMS, this lively reference work is an excellent companion volume to Thorpe and James' popular Ancient Inventions.”
–Archaeology Odyssey
Peter James is a professional writer on ancient history and archeology. He studied at Birmingham and London universities and describes himself as a "generalist" in the study of the ancient Near East and Mediterranean. He has published numerous articles on ancient technology, chronology, and the history of science and is the principal author of the highly controversial Centuries of Darkness and a forthcoming book on Atlantis, The Sunken Kingdom.
Dr. Nick Thorpe, an archeologist in prehistory, studied at Reading and London universities and is now lecturer in archeology at King Alfred's College, Winchester. He directs research projects in Britain and Denmark. He has contributed articles on agriculture and chronology, metalworking, astronomy, and prehistoric society to numerous books and journals and is a coauthor of Centuries of Darkness.
From the Hardcover edition.
LOST LANDS AND CATASTROPHES
INTRODUCTION
On July 16, 1994, a small fragmenting comet known as Shoemaker-Levy began ripping through the atmosphere of the planet Jupiter, causing explosions of almost unimaginable intensity. As the second fragment fell there was a blast equivalent to 250 million tons of TNT—several times more powerful than all the world's nuclear arsenals put together. When the third chunk of the comet struck it created a hole in Jupiter's atmosphere the size of the Earth. The full extent of the damage that Shoemaker-Levy inflicted on Jupiter is still being assessed, though one thing is already perfectly clear: the long-cherished scientific belief that comets are harmless and cannot crash into planets has been dispelled forever.
The question immediately arises—could a comet, or cometary fragment, crash into the Earth? Or has it already done so? In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, in the days before Darwin, scientists freely speculated about such matters, wondering whether a comet might have been responsible for the Great Flood described in the Bible. While theologians were happy to accept that the Flood was caused by God directly, scientists were busy researching possible physical mechanisms. Some, including the great Edmond Halley (who gave his name to the famous comet), looked beyond the Earth for a trigger. In 1694 he proposed, in a paper to the Royal Society, that Noah's Flood was caused by the collision between the Earth and a comet, which landed in the Caspian Sea and drenched the surrounding lands with water. Others speculated that a watery comet was responsible.
From the standpoint of pre-Darwinian science, belief in a Great Flood was entirely reasonable, as such an event seemed to explain many of the world's greatest historical enigmas. The rocks that scientists were beginning to examine were full of the fossilized remains of millions of extinct plants and creatures, and a catastrophic flood could account for why these life-forms no longer existed and why their remains had been trapped and preserved in sedimentary rock. It seemed natural, then, to borrow an explanation from the Bible, which told of the deluge in the time of Noah. Assuming that there had been a real Flood also provided an economical explanation for why there are so many similar legends around the world.
Such quaint ideas went completely out of fashion in the early nineteenth century. The relatively new science of geology was maturing, and the naive view that all the world's rock strata had been laid down in a single event was seen to be unworkable. It was becoming clear that there was a whole sequence of layers from different ages, laid one upon the other, each containing its own life-forms. The question now was what had created these strata and how long they took to form. One school of geology was the catastrophists, who expanded the idea of a Great Flood into a whole series of cataclysms—sometimes of water, sometimes of fire (from volcanic activity). Their opponents represented a new school of thought—the uniformitarians. Founded in the 1830s by lawyer Charles Lyell, they set new ground rules for the debate. Geologists generally agreed that special causes—such as direct divine intervention—should be excluded from scientific discussion, and Lyell now introduced his principles of “uniformity,” which attempted to rule out special events as well.
The law of uniformity states that the “present is the key to the past”: only the same forces that are visible today were responsible for shaping the world. On a general level this makes perfect sense. There is no point assuming that the laws of physics were once different and, for example, that gravity had no effect a million years ago. On the other hand, Lyell and his followers excluded the possibility of anything happening in the past that is not observable now: there were no great deluges, global conflagrations, impacts by comets, or other major catastrophes for the simple reason that such things do not happen today. (Had they witnessed something like the Shoemaker-Levy event, they might have thought very differently about comets.) Instead, the uniformitarians argued, the Earth's strata had been laid down gradually over millions of years.
It was easy for Lyell and his followers to characterize catastrophism as smacking of old-time religion, and to present themselves as progressive and scientific. Catastrophist geologists—most of whom were just as secular in outlook as their opponents—were forced into retreat, and the triumph of Charles Darwin sealed their fate. When Darwin published his controversial Origin of Species in 1859, he chose to fit his theory of evolution into a uniformitarian, gradualist mold. Evolution as such does not require a gradual path—in fact, the fossil record suggests that all major changes have been very rapid. Yet Darwin, despite his own observations in South America of the sudden and catastrophic demise of its prehistoric fauna, elected for gradualism. Part of the reason must have been to be on the “winning side.” The other was that the uniformitarians, like Darwin, inevitably challenged the literal truth of the Bible.
By this stage, catastrophism, antievolutionism, and biblical fundamentalism had become nicely muddled—at least in the minds of Darwinians. When Darwinism won the debate, catastrophism was thought to have been debunked, along with the stories of Adam and Eve and Noah's Flood. Here there was another force at work besides the desire to develop a rationalist view of the Earth's history free from biblical influence. This was the straightforward desire—shared by scientists with the rest of us—to view the Earth as a safe place to live. This desire was the root cause of a fierce and protracted philosophical debate that had been raging for over two thousand years. On the one side was Plato, who used the evidence of myth and legend (as well as his own gleanings from geology and archaeology) to argue that the Earth had been subject to periodic catastrophes brought about by causes outside our world. On the other side was his pupil Aristotle, who insisted that as the heavens were made of perfect matter they could present no dangers to the Earth.
Aristotle's cozy worldview had been steadily eroded since the Middle Ages, but in the eighteenth century it managed to sneak back into scientific thinking through the work of Sir Isaac Newton. His hidden agenda was to restore an Aristotelian worldview, in which the world was protected from catastrophe by Divine Providence. In 1708, when his star pupil, mathematician William Whiston, published a book arguing that a comet had caused Noah's Flood, Newton turned on him and started a campaign to wreck his career.
Newton, Lyell and Darwin made a formidable combination. From the late nineteenth century onward, catastrophist theories were sidelined, at least in Britain, then the leader of the world's scientific trends.
Matters were not helped by the stream of books on lost lands and catastrophes that began to pour from the pens of writers on the wilder fringe of archaeology. The idea of a lost continent in the Atlantic, first written about by Plato, became a favorite topic, particularly among those who claimed they had psychic sources of information about the supercivilization of “Atlantis” (see Edgar Cayce on Atlantis in Archaeology and the Supernatural). Not content with one lost continent, some of these writers invented a partner for Atlantis called Mu or Lemuria, which began its literary career in the Indian Ocean but later expanded into the Pacific. Despite numerous claims to the contrary, absolutely nothing about it is based in genuine myth or legend.
The name Mu comes from that of “Queen Moo” of Atlantis, which Augustus le Plongeon (1826–1908), an eccentric pioneer of Central American archaeology, mistakenly believed he could read in the texts of the ancient Maya of Central America. (According to le Plongeon, the Maya came from Atlantis.) The alternative name Lemuria came about in the late nineteenth century when the great German naturalist Ernst Haeckel suggested that a land-bridge stretching across the Indian Ocean from Madagascar to India might explain the widespread distribution of the small tree-dwelling mammals called lemurs. An English naturalist, Philip Sclater, soon afterward coined the name “Lemuria.” There was never any solid evidence for such a land-bridge—an idea that became redundant after the discovery of continental drift—yet this did not stop occult theorists from developing Lemuria into the “real” homeland of the human race.
Lemuria was taken to its greatest heights in the writings of Madame Helena Blavatsky, the eccentric Russian émigré who founded the Theosophical Society in London in 1875. Theosophy blended the teachings of Christianity and Buddhism with mystical revelations that Blavatsky claimed to have received personally from “Secret Masters,” mysterious guardians of an ancient tradition who lived in hidden cities in Tibet. The Masters revealed to her the true history of the Earth, including a succession of strange “races” that had inhabited the world before our own species emerged. The Third Race, which had lived on Lemuria, were egg-laying hermaphrodites, sometimes with four arms and an eye in the back of their heads. According to some Theosophist writers, these Lemurians evolved into a Fourth Race, strapping giants up to 15 feet tall who led around pet dinosaurs on leashes. Lemuria/Mu, like Atlantis, was thought to have been destroyed by earthquakes and sunk beneath the waves.
With enthusiasts like the occultists, catastrophism had little need for enemies. By the middle of this century the idea of past global upheavals was treated by scientists with abhorrence. It was extremely unfortunate timing for Immanuel Velikovsky, who produced an extreme catastrophist model for solar system history in 1950 (see The Day the Sun Stood Still? in Watching the Skies).
Yet catastrophism is now making a serious comeback—because of the sheer weight of hard evidence in its favor. The geological evidence is, in fact, perfectly clear: all the great epochs in Earth's history ended with the complete extermination of vast numbers of life-forms. During the 1960s a trickle, then a steady stream, of scientific studies began to appear correlating the great extinctions with other upheavals of nature—including massive changes in climate, dramatic fluctuations in sea level, peaks of volcanic activity, and even reversals of the Earth's magnetic field. Far from being quiet, it now seems that Earth's history has been shaped by massive catastrophes, sometimes of global proportions. Of course gradual processes—of the kind we see today—have always played their part. The uniformitarians were right to stress these, but utterly wrong in excluding catastrophes. As put by Derek Ager, Professor of Geology at the University of Bristol, En- gland, and a pioneer in the renaissance of catastrophist thinking, “the history of any one part of the earth, like the life of a soldier, consists of long periods of boredom and short periods of terror.”
So what was behind the great upheavals that had punctuated the Earth's history? In some cases, such as the massive catastrophe that ended the Cretaceous period and wiped out the dinosaurs, some 65 million years ago, the answer is quite clear. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that at the end of the Cretaceous the world was struck with devastating effect by an asteroid. |
Item Specifications...
Pages 672
Dimensions: Length: 1.5" Width: 7.25" Height: 9.25"
Weight: 1.95 lbs.
Binding Softcover
Release Date Oct 30, 2001
Publisher Ballantine Books
ISBN 0345434889
EAN 9780345434883
|
Availability 4 units.
Availability accurate as of May 26, 2012 10:06.
Usually ships within one to two business days from Momence, IL.
Orders shipping to an address other than a confirmed Credit Card / Paypal Billing address may incur and additional processing delay.
|
About this Author/Artist Peter James is a professional writer on ancient history and archeology. He studied at Birmingham and London universities and describes himself as a "generalist" in the study of the ancient Near East and Mediterranean. He has published numerous articles on ancient technology, chronology, and the history of science and is the principal author of the highly controversial Centuries of Darkness and a forthcoming book on Atlantis, The Sunken Kingdom.<br><br>Dr. Nick Thorpe, an archeologist in prehistory, studied at Reading and London universities and is now lecturer in archeology at King Alfred's College, Winchester. He directs research projects in Britain and Denmark. He has contributed articles on agriculture and chronology, metalworking, astronomy, and prehistoric society to numerous books and journals and is a coa
Product Categories
Similar Products
Reviews - What do our customers think?
 | Intelligent and Entertaining Jun 20, 2007 |
The chapters follow a general pattern in which the authors present the most inventive & appealing of "crackpot" theories and then examine the actual evidence to see where it leads. Quite often the mysteries remain unsolved, but usually the fun speculative explanations completely fall apart along the way. This book debunks without being smug or insulting. Not only was it educational, it was genuinely fun to read.
Here is the first intelligent rebuttal to Graham Hancock's theories, which have gripped my imagination since reading _Fingerprints of the Gods_ a decade ago. I knew Hancock's ideas were generally dismissed by the scientific community but never knew WHY until this book explained how flimsy his evidence and how flawed his reasoning was. Why was this information so hard to find? Why did it take so long for somebody to write a popularly accessible book dealing with these subjects from a rational, scientific viewpoint?
Hancock is not 100% disproven by this book, but many of his major theories are undermined, casting serious doubt on his conclusions. I'd call this book necessary reading for anyone who was captivated by _Fingerprints of the Gods_ or _The Message of the Sphinx_. You need this valuable perspective from the "other side" of the debate. | | |  | Comprehensive, never boring, a little p.c. Jun 14, 2007 |
This is THE book exploring, from an open-minded and rational perspective, all those historical mysteries that are touched on in tv specials, tabloids, and other pop culture venues but rarely discussed in depth.
Perhaps most importantly, this book credibly debunks outlandish theories of alien contributions to human culture by showing that primitive societies were capable of all the magnificent feats attributed to them, including the construction of the pyramids of Giza, the scratching out of the Nazca lines, and the erection of the stone heads at Easter Island. It also finds no real evidence for the existence of ley lines and makes quick work of the entire idea that there was ever an Atlantis.
But the banaltiy of discovering that such accomplishments as the pyramids were achieved by mere humans is compensated for by the novelty - at least to the average reader like myself - of theories postulating, for example, that meteorite activity was resposible for the destruction of Old Testament cities, or that an ancient Roman army may have settled in China. The authors' contention that there is too much reliable, anecdotal evidence for the scientifically minded to dismiss the idea of reincarnation out of hand was perhaps the authors' bravest single conclusion.
I have only two critiques of this book, and while they are minor, they prevent me from giving it a full five stars. For one, I was irked at the authors' occasional impulse to genuflect, albeit slightly, to the gods of political correctness. For example, the incredulity that European explorers expressed at the idea that the ancestors of the primitive, South American tribes living in the area of magnificent, pre-Inca ruins could have built such wondrous structures is described as mere, unforgiveable racism. Yet no accusation of racism is made when discussing how Europeans unjustly credited non-European cultures (such as Persians, Phoenicians, Babylonians, Egyptians and the mythical Atlanteans) with building ancient European monuments--despite the fact that these Europeans plainly stated that the primitive tribes inhabiting Britain at the time of the construction of Stonehenge, for example, could never have achieved such an undertaking. Why the double standard?
The section on the this sites was fascinating, but also suffered from political correctness. The authors provide good evidence that ancient tribes living on the Russian steppes contained a signficant number of female warriors. In some areas, female skeletons were found in up to 20% of all "warrior graves." Yet this by no means implies a matriarchal society, and while the authors are careful to point out that an all-female warrior society most likely never existed, their off-the-cuff suggestion, at one point, that the women in these tribes may well have been in charge flies in the face of everything we know about ancient societies. The probable existence of a significant minority of female warriors is not enough to support such a provocative claim.
Finally, I was annoyed that the authors took time to argue that the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah was not homosexuality but inhospitality. I have no personal investment in the traditional interpretation of the Biblical text, and seeing as to how the authors' seem to truly believe that a misunderstanding of this story has led to centuries of unjustified discrimination against gays, I sympathize with their desire to set the record straight. Regardless, if I want theology, there's a whole other section of the book store for that.
My second issue with this book is that parts of it are dated. The cocaine found in some Egyptian mummies has been explained since this book's publication as residue from a related, Old World plant used in the embalming process. There is no need for a trans-Atlantic drug trade stretching back tens of thousands of years. To the authors' credit, they predict this finding, but this doesn't change the fact that the whole section is a waste of time for the reader. Nevertheless, as science progresses such revisions are inevitable, and until someone writes a better book - or the authors' themselves update this one - this remains the book to read for those fascinated by the ideas of ancient mysteries and wanting a non-dogmatic, scientific scoop. | | | | Enlightening! Jun 21, 2006 |
| This book sees through several ancient mysteries, all well known to the literate public, from a very carefully open minded and neutral standpoint. Obviously well researched, you can find several theories backed by evidential information to each topic presented in the book; from the beginnings of the Atlantis legend, to the origin of Dracula. Perhaps the best book to obtain general information about a wide variety of ancient mysteries. If you are at all interested in reading this book, I recommend you find this book at your local bookstore to read the acknowledgement pages at the begining, as well as to compare your prices. You will see the kind of effort that was put into the exceptionally wide and enlightening perspective over the given topics the authors have to offer. The amount of information you can find for each topic in this book is amazing, even encyclopedic in scale. Judging by the author's insights towards other works of the same genre, this book is much more credible for its facts, making it more significant as informative literature. You can get all sides to one topic, and nothing is stated to be over-concluded so you are given the benefit of a doubt, while shown a window for truth. I can ensure that it will be a fun read. | | |  | Ancient Mysteries slamming the competetion Feb 16, 2006 |
| This was a very interesting read, untill you realize that the authors have turned this book into a platform to slam Graham Hancock's research in almost every other paragraph. For the theories and subjects to supposedly be approached with an open view, you can bet the money you spent on this book that the authors will take an opposing view to anything Hancock has written. The space that could have been filled with interesting points and observations are instead filled with repetitious slams against Hancock and anyone who may support his theories and oppinions. It would make a great read, if you care to muddle through the finger pointing and biases twards others research. | | | | Not reliable source for information Jul 30, 2005 |
| Overall this was a very interesting read, however there were many "facts" that were not necessarily true. For example there is a section that questions how old Jesus was in his years of ministry wherein the author explains that nowhere does the Bible make any reference to his age. But the Bible does in fact state his age, and quite clearly, in Luke 3:23 where it tells us that he was 30. Despite the unreliability this was an enjoyable book to read. | | | Write your own review about Ancient Mysteries: Discover the latest intriguiging, Scientifically sound explinations to Age-old puzzles
|
|
(0 Items)
